Supreme Court upholds Texas law requiring age checks for online adult content

Diana Furchtgott-Roth Director, Center for Energy, Climate, and Environment and The Herbert and Joyce Morgan Fellow in Energy and Environmental Policy
Diana Furchtgott-Roth Director, Center for Energy, Climate, and Environment and The Herbert and Joyce Morgan Fellow in Energy and Environmental Policy - The Heritage Foundation
0Comments

The Heritage Foundation has expressed approval following the Supreme Court’s decision in the case of Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton. The ruling, with a 6-3 majority, upholds Texas law H.B. 1181, which requires age verification for accessing online pornography. The Court determined that this law is a constitutional measure to protect minors from exposure to sexual material on the internet.

Annie Chestnut Tutor, a policy analyst at The Heritage Foundation’s Center for Technology and the Human Person, commented on the decision: “The Supreme Court’s decision is a historic victory for the fight to protect children from obscenity. Texas’s age verification requirement is constitutional, and states nationwide have a clear pathway forward to implement similar safeguards.”

Tutor emphasized that exposure to pornography causes harm to children and that age verification is essential in preventing access by minors. She stated, “The state not only has a compelling interest to protect children from obscenity—it has a duty.”

Texas H.B. 1181 was enacted in 2023 and mandates websites with significant sexual content to establish age-verification systems and provide health warnings. Plaintiffs argued that this law infringed upon First Amendment rights by limiting adults’ access to protected speech without applying strict scrutiny. However, the Supreme Court sided with Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, affirming that the law constitutionally protects minors.

Hans von Spakovsky of The Heritage Foundation also supported the ruling: “This ruling rightly places the power in the hands of the people and their elected lawmakers to protect children from sexually explicit content online.”

Von Spakovsky noted that this decision aligns free speech laws more closely with constitutional principles rather than judicial precedents developed over decades.

The Heritage Foundation believes this outcome could encourage other states to enact similar legislation aimed at safeguarding children while respecting free speech rights.



Related

Representative Juan Ciscomani

Juan Ciscomani votes against reining in tariffs affecting Arizona food costs

Juan Ciscomani has voted nine times to protect tariffs impacting Arizona’s food prices, according to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

JoAnna Mendoza, Marine Corps veteran, single mom

Poll shows JoAnna Mendoza leading incumbent Juan Ciscomani by three points

A new poll shows JoAnna Mendoza leading incumbent Juan Ciscomani by three points.

Congressman Eli Crane

DCCC says Crane and Ciscomani-backed policies raise costs for Arizona families

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee says Eli Crane and Juan Ciscomani’s policies are raising living costs for Arizona families.

Top Headlines: