The U.S. Supreme Court issued an 8-1 decision on March 31 in Chiles v. Salazar, overturning a Colorado law that banned therapists from counseling minors against changing their gender identities while allowing counseling in favor of such changes. The case involved Kaley Chiles, a licensed Christian counselor in Colorado whose clients sought her guidance due to her faith-based approach.
The ruling holds significance for free speech and the rights of therapists and their clients to engage in open conversations about gender identity. Supporters argue it protects the ability of counselors to address the needs and beliefs of those seeking help without government interference.
Family Research Council President Tony Perkins said, “A Supreme Court win for free speech and biological reality. I’m encouraged to see the muzzle removed from therapists seeking to help willing patients come to terms with, and be at peace with, how God created them. The Left is using the levers of government to block families and individuals seeking help. Under Colorado law, a girl could legally seek a therapist’s help to change her gender but could not seek help from that same therapist to align her identity with her biological sex. Where is the fairness or logic in that? I commend the Court for striking down this deeply invasive and unjust law.”
Dr. Jennifer Bauwens, Senior Research Fellow at Family Research Council and licensed clinician, also commented: “The counseling profession has proved to be a lifeline for many hurting people. When clinicians are free to conduct thorough assessments and develop treatment plans based in science and not on dogmatic ideologies, the therapeutic space can be a safe and healing place. I’m grateful to see a near consensus with the Supreme Court’s decision. This ruling will allow every therapist to simply talk to their clients without facing the fear of retribution. Today is a win for counselors, their clients, and all Americans who cherish the First Amendment which affords us the right to speak freely.”
The Family Research Council submitted an amicus brief arguing that affirming perceived gender identity may lead children toward irreversible medical interventions with potential long-term consequences.
Observers note that this decision may influence future debates over state laws regulating therapy practices related to sexual orientation or gender identity.
