Last week, authorities in the Democratic Republic of Congo imposed a 90-day ban on media coverage of former President Joseph Kabila and his party. This decision followed Kabila’s recent statements and visit to the country’s troubled eastern region after returning from exile.
Joseph Kabila led the country for 18 years, succeeding his father Laurent-Désiré Kabila, who was assassinated in 2001. While his presidency saw some progress, it was also marked by significant human rights abuses. As he extended his stay beyond the constitutional two-term limit, Kabila increasingly relied on violence and repression.
Before returning to Congo in late May, Kabila broadcast a speech on YouTube criticizing current President Félix Tshisekedi and proposing peace plans for the east. He has since held consultations in Goma, an area controlled by the Rwandan-backed M23 armed group. After stepping down in 2019, Kabila received the title “senator for life,” granting him broad immunities under the constitution. However, last month, the Senate stripped him of immunity due to treason charges related to allegedly supporting rebels.
Congo is currently facing its most severe crisis in years. The M23 occupies eastern provincial capitals Goma and Bukavu and has committed numerous war crimes. In response, the Congolese government has provided financial and military support to a coalition of militias accused of similar abuses.
The escalating conflict since late 2024 has seen threats against journalists covering it. Authorities have suspended international journalists reporting on “alleged advances of terrorists” and warned that those sharing information about M23 and Rwandan forces could face severe legal consequences, including capital punishment.
Historically tolerant but often begrudgingly so towards public criticism, Congolese authorities are now tightening restrictions on media freedom. Journalists have a right to report on Kabila’s return freely; likewise, citizens should be able to debate his role openly. Authorities must recognize that banning media coverage might backfire as it could inadvertently draw more attention to Kabila by prohibiting discussion about him.
